When using or integrating software into your own project, it’s essential to understand the terms of its license. Licenses define what you’re allowed to do, what you’re required to do, and what limitations apply. In this lesson, we’ll compare the MIT License and the GNU General Public License (GPL), then list what to look for when reading any software license.
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2025 [Your Name]
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND...
Highlights of MIT License:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation
You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changes,
state modifications, and license your entire project under the GPL if it uses
GPL-covered code.
You must also make your source code available to users, and provide notices
regarding your changes and license terms.
Highlights of GPL v3:
After reading the license, detect whether the permissiveness level is enough for your use case.
Always read the full text of a license before using software in your project. The difference between permissive licenses (like MIT) and copyleft licenses (like GPL) can have major implications for your product, especially if you plan to distribute or commercialize it. Understanding what each license allows, requires, and restricts will help you stay compliant and avoid legal or ethical issues.