Home 5 Security 5 Software Composite Analysis (SCA): How secured are the dependencies?

Software Composite Analysis (SCA): How secured are the dependencies?

by | Oct 12, 2024

This post discusses Software Composition Analysis (SCA), a security test focused on identifying vulnerabilities and licensing issues in third-party libraries and dependencies. It highlights how SCA fits into security testing alongside SAST and DAST, and outlines actions like upgrading, replacing, or patching insecure components to protect your software. Continuous monitoring is emphasized to maintain security over time.

Developers are no longer building everything from scratch. Instead, much of the code in modern applications comes from open-source libraries, third-party dependencies, and pre-built components. This reliance on external sources can drastically speed up development, but it introduces a new challenge: How secure are the building blocks of your software?

This is where Software Composition Analysis (SCA) comes into play. SCA is a crucial type of security test that ensures the external dependencies in your application are free from vulnerabilities and are compliant with licensing requirements. While other security tests like SAST and DAST focus on your code and its behavior, SCA zooms in on the components that you didn’t write, ensuring that your dependencies are as secure as the rest of your application.

Types of Security Tests: How SCA Fits In

To understand SCA better, it helps to compare it to other common types of security testing:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST) analyzes the application’s source code, inspecting for vulnerabilities before the code is executed. It’s like reviewing a building blueprint to make sure no design flaws are present. However, SAST focuses primarily on the developer’s own code and less on third-party components.
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), unlike SAST, tests a running application, simulating real-world attacks to identify vulnerabilities that arise only when the system is live. It’s like sending inspectors into a finished building to look for cracks or structural weaknesses.
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA) deals with something you didn’t write, while SAST and DAST deal with the code you’ve written or the application’s runtime behavior, SCA focuses entirely on third-party dependencies. It checks libraries, frameworks, and external components to ensure they are not introducing vulnerabilities into your application.

SCA is especially critical in the modern development landscape, where developers often integrate a multitude of third-party libraries into their applications. Even if your code is perfect, an insecure dependency can leave your system exposed to threats.

What Would SCA Result In?

When performing SCA scan, the primary goal is to uncover potential risks hiding in the external components of your software. An SCA scan typically results in a detailed report that includes:

  1. Vulnerability Information: A list of known vulnerabilities in the libraries and dependencies that are part of your project. These vulnerabilities are often categorized by severity (e.g., critical, high, medium, low) to help prioritize responses.
  2. Licensing Issues: Not all open-source software is free to use without restrictions. SCA will also flag any dependencies that might have restrictive or incompatible licenses, ensuring compliance with intellectual property laws.
  3. Versioning Issues: SCA reports may also highlight outdated or deprecated versions of dependencies. It will recommend newer versions that have addressed security flaws or bugs.

DON’T

Don’t rely on SCA results alone, as a vulnerable dependency doesn’t directly mean an exploitable one.

In short, an SCA scan provides you with a thorough breakdown of the external components in your software, ensuring you know exactly where potential risks might lie and where updates are needed.

What Actions Can Be Taken Based on SCA?

After reviewing the results of an SCA report, several actions can be taken to reduce the risks posed by insecure or outdated dependencies:

  1. Upgrade Vulnerable Dependencies: The most straightforward response is to upgrade any libraries or frameworks that have known vulnerabilities. SCA tools will usually recommend newer, safer versions of the affected components.
  2. Remove or Replace Risky Components: In cases where upgrading isn’t an option, you may need to replace the insecure library with an alternative or even remove the dependency altogether if it’s no longer essential.
  3. Patch Vulnerabilities: In some cases, you may need to patch a vulnerable dependency manually if an update or replacement isn’t immediately available. Patching, though less ideal, can mitigate risks temporarily while waiting for an official fix.
  4. Monitor Continuously: Finally, even after resolving the immediate vulnerabilities, continuous monitoring is crucial. Open-source vulnerabilities can emerge over time, so regularly running SCA as part of your CI/CD pipeline ensures ongoing security.

DO

Mitigate highest-risk vulnerable library first even if it has less vulnerabilities count that others, as a single high severity risk can cause more damage than many low severity risks.


In conclusion, Software Composition Analysis (SCA) plays an essential role in modern software development by ensuring that the external components your project relies on are secure, compliant, and up to date. By integrating SCA into your security testing process, you can gain a clearer understanding of the risks posed by third-party dependencies and take swift action to mitigate them.

Did you know?

Codenteam gives you all needed information around risks in SCA both in Analysis home page and in the report and it updates on each analysis update.

Related Articles